通知
Card image cap

【CC中字&ENG】百變 Carry Magic Kei-Truck!80 年代 Suzuki Carry 變露營車無難度!|拍車男
6天前

購物車

訂單備註
訂單摘要
折扣: $0.00
運費: $0.00
總價: $0.00
優惠碼

While recent generations of the Corvette have significant performance advantages over their predecessors, many still prefer the looks of the originals, in particular the C2 and C3 models. For those people, this 1968 restomod could be the perfect car.

Heading to auction on January 7-16, this C3 Chevrolet Corvette has been outfitted with a host of modern modifications that should have a transformative impact on the way it drives.

Read Also: What’s A Restomodded 1965 Corvette Stingray With A C5 Z06 V8 Worth To You?

Underpinning the car is a reinforced Street Shop chassis that includes fully independent suspension from a C7 model. The real highlight of the car is the fact that it has been fitted with GM’s 7.0-liter LS7 V8 that pumps out 505 hp and is coupled to a T6 six-speed transmission driving the rear wheels. While the Mecum Auctions listing doesn’t provide any performance details, the car should probably keep pace with a C7 Stingray in a straight line.

The modified C3 has the same big brake kit as a 2018 C7 Z06, is painted in the same shade of Mosaic Black which was offered for the C7 Z06, and is sitting on Asanti three-piece carbon fiber wheels that measure 20×9 at the front and 20×13 at the rear. Moreover, the car also sports a full-leather interior with orange contrast stitching and orange seat belts.

The auction house expects the Corvette C3 restomod to sell for $200,000-$235,000.

PHOTO GALLERY
more photos...

Ever since its inception, Formula 1 has always been the premiere level of motorsport, and as such, the cars that race in it are some of the most technologically advanced on the planet. That being said, what was advanced 50 years ago is not so advanced by modern standards, and we can perform a good comparison by looking at the engines.

The comparison was first brought up on Twitter by Matt Grant, co-owner of Cosworth parts supplier Modatek.

Pictured below are two Formula 1 engine blocks from Cosworth, about 50 years apart. The one on the right is from a 1967 Cosworth DFV (double four valve) 3.0L V8 and the one on the left is from a 2013 Cosworth CA 2.4L V8.

See: McLaren Making Big Changes To Their 2021 F1 Car – Will It Work Out?

The DFV is one of the most famous F1 engines of all time, powering many iconic cars in the history of the sport. The 90-degree V8 won its first race in 1967 with Jim Clark, and went on to win 155 more until the end of its run in 1983 with Keke Rosberg.

By contrast, the CA might not have been as much of a winning machine as the DFV, but it was still a good engine and allowed many smaller teams, who had restricted finances, to partake in the sport. What the CA’s true claim to fame was, however, was it being the last V8 in F1, since the series made the switch to a V6 hybrid system in 2014.

Some more comparative photos of the progress made in #F1 engine design over a period of nearly 50 years. Piston, head and block from the Cosworth CA from 2013 (on the left) versus the DFV from 1967 (on the right). pic.twitter.com/V77H2NuLKM

— Matt Grant (@Racing_Matt) December 29, 2020

If we look at the two engines, we can see all the technological progress that has been made in the 46 years that separate them. The first thing you’ll notice right away is the size difference, despite the CA only being 0.6L smaller than the DFV. Thanks to Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining we are able to manufacture much more advanced, efficient designs compared to what was possible nearly half a century ago.

If we look at the piston heads of the two engines below, we can see a similar size difference between them as we did with the engine blocks. Again, the 2013 CA’s piston heads are able to be so much smaller and lighter than the 1967 DFV’s without sacrificing strength due to all the advancements made in manufacturing processes and materials.

Read: Vanwall Brand Brought Back From The Dead, Will Launch Six 1958 F1 Continuation Cars

And even since 2013, F1’s scientists and engineers have made huge strides in power unit technology and efficiency, now having the hybrid system to deal with in addition to the engine. For example, some of the current F1 engines are able to operate at 50 percent thermal efficiency, which means that 50% of the engine’s fuel is converted into propulsion force and the other 50 percent is lost as heat. That might not sound great, until you realize that a regular road car’s engine operates at a thermal efficiency of around 30 percent. That’s only one of so many advancements made since then, and more are being made every single day.

Opening photo: Mark Grand of Modatek @ Twitter

Shocking footage has surfaced online showing the moment a massive semi-truck side-swiped a Tesla Model 3 in the U.S. last year.

This video was recently posted to the Wham Baam Teslacam channel on YouTube and reveals that the incident occurred on a tollway in Colorado. While the truck driver was to blame for the crash, it could have been easily avoided.

Read Also: Tesla Model 3 Wrecked In High-Speed Crash, Battery Cells Fly Into House And Start Fire

As the front-facing camera of the Tesla reveals, it was approaching a large semi-truck in the right lane. Suddenly, however, the trucker merged into the lane being occupied by the Tesla. The truck slams into the side of the Model 3, shattering its passenger-side windows and sending it into the median where its driver, Aaron Smith, managed to swerve around the cable barriers before coming to a stop.

Images taken of the Tesla after the crash show that both the passenger side doors were scratched and dented heavily by the truck. The passenger-side front wheel was also ruined, as was the front bumper. Unsurprisingly, the narrator of this video says that the Tesla was determined to be a total loss.

Could the crash have been avoided? Yes. If you re-watch the clip, you’ll notice that the trucker had his turn signal on and was looking to change into the left lan, so perhaps the Tesla driver could have backed off the throttle to let the truck in. Not that this is any excuse for the truck driver, who should have taken much more care when changing into the left lane. Had they looked in their mirrors, they would have seen the approaching Model 3.